Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:29:46 -0500 From: Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r277213 - in head: share/man/man9 sys/kern sys/ofed/include/linux sys/sys Message-ID: <88A39F5F-A9F4-432F-8BAB-9393DAA8F36A@lakerest.net> In-Reply-To: <54C0B75B.9070305@selasky.org> References: <201501151532.t0FFWV2Y037455@svn.freebsd.org> <CAJ-Vmok0GXZoojyi=jE=b5D-d338APztaf3Pw0_AAQ-173XSWw@mail.gmail.com> <54BDD9E1.6090505@selasky.org> <20150120075126.GA42409@kib.kiev.ua> <54BE0AAA.4050104@selasky.org> <20150120090057.GD42409@kib.kiev.ua> <54BE21F0.6010602@selasky.org> <7C692107-51CF-4DFA-BD6C-623D56893150@bsdimp.com> <54C0A352.8090701@selasky.org> <20150122081023.GT42409@kib.kiev.ua> <54C0B75B.9070305@selasky.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hans Thats great, could you please open a project branch that we can look at it in too? I would very much appreciate that. Sometimes I like to look at the whole code with it all in place (not just patches) and a project branch really helps with that. R > On Jan 22, 2015, at 3:39 AM, Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> wrote: > > On 01/22/15 09:10, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 08:14:26AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>> On 01/22/15 06:26, Warner Losh wrote: >>> > >>>>> The code simply needs an update. It is not broken in any ways - right? If it is not broken, fixing it is not that urgent. >>>> >>>> Radically changing the performance characteristics is breaking the code. Performance regression in the TCP stack is urgent to fix. >> >>> Not being able to enumerate what all the consumers are that use this and >>> provide an analysis about why they aren?t important to fix is a bug in >>> your process, and in your interaction with the project. We simply do not >>> operate that way. >> Right, I completely agree with this statement. >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> My plan is to work out a patch for the TCP stack today, which only >>> change the callout_init() call or its function. This should not need any >>> particular review. I'll let adrian test and review, because I think he >>> is closer to me timezone wise and you're standing on my head saying its >>> urgent. If he is still not happy, I can back my change out. Else it >>> remains in -current AS-IS. >> TCP regresssion was noted, so it is brought in front. There is nothing >> else which makes TCP issue different from other (hidden) issues. >> >> =========================== >>> MFC to 10-stable I can delay for sure until >>> all issues you report to me are fixed. >> =========================== >> >> Sigh, you still do not understand. It is your duty to identify all pieces >> which break after your change. After that, we can argue whether each of >> them is critical or not to allow the migration. But this must have been >> done before the KPI change hit the tree. >> > > Hi, > > Are you saying that pieces of code that runs completely unlocked using "volatile" as only synchronization mechanism is better than what I would call a temporary and hopefully short TCP stack performance loss? > > I don't understand? How frequently do you reboot your boxes? Maybe one every day? And you don't care? > > --HPS > > > ------------------------------ Randall Stewart 803-317-4952 (cell)help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?88A39F5F-A9F4-432F-8BAB-9393DAA8F36A>