Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:01:09 +0800 From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "Petr Holub" <hopet@ics.muni.cz> Cc: performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Myrinet 10GE performance on 7.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <d763ac660710120601p1f2e6fbau569ec62dbc182eea@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <041101c80cc9$a96111d0$5317fb93@KLOBOUCEK> References: <d763ac660710091737r64bcb1ffn17c4bca3bc986424@mail.gmail.com> <041101c80cc9$a96111d0$5317fb93@KLOBOUCEK>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/10/2007, Petr Holub <hopet@ics.muni.cz> wrote: > Hi, > > as promised and following your suggestions, I've re-run those performance > tests, included TCP and pps information and put the results here: > http://arwen.ics.muni.cz/~hopet/FreeBSD/7.0-netperf/ > > There's still quite a lot of things to do, however I hope you find > it useful as of now. I send an update when I find some time to > proceed with the measurements. Thanks for that. So its showing ~ 600k pps throughput. I'd love to know whats setting that upper limit - is it iperf? Userspace? Interrupt thread/device driver? Other kernel stuff? This is just a curiousity for me at the moment. I hear people occasionally using 10GE cards in Linux/FreeBSD setups as routers and I'm interested in how the degenerate case performs. -- Adrian Chadd - adrian@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d763ac660710120601p1f2e6fbau569ec62dbc182eea>