Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Aug 2001 01:17:05 -0400
From:      Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@halplant.com>
To:        "Robert J. Adams" <radams@siscom.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Large /dev/md0 ramdisk
Message-ID:  <20010814011705.D67874@hal9000.servehttp.com>
In-Reply-To: <078a01c12466$345dc830$7215fbd1@jason>; from radams@siscom.net on Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 09:42:34PM -0400
References:  <078a01c12466$345dc830$7215fbd1@jason>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert,

Please forgive me not answering your question, but just responding to an
issue you've raised.

> From what I've read, md is a better way of going than mfs.

I have seen several references to md being preferred to mfs but have been
unable to find any detailed comparison or evaluation. To what reference
were you referring?

I've also seen it suggested that mfs is to go away, leaving only md. For
happy mfs users like myself who enjoy the convenience of a simple flexible
fstab entry sufficing for memory backed non-persistent filesystems, that
is of some concern.

Perhaps someone on -hackers could provide a good pointer or give details.


-Andrew-
-- 
 ______________________________________________________________________
| -Andrew J. Caines-   Unix Systems Engineer   A.J.Caines@halplant.com |

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010814011705.D67874>