Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:15:03 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is `ccd' broken on Alpha? Message-ID: <20010328151503.A88970@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <15042.28453.158495.901316@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>; from gallatin@cs.duke.edu on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:09:25PM -0500 References: <20010328000954.C18676@dragon.nuxi.com> <15042.28453.158495.901316@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:09:25PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> Pilot error of some type?
Maybe, but the same piloting works on i386. So something is being
treated differently between the two platforms.
> It works fine for me using 'c' paritions.
In general one should not use the `c' partition. Aren't you also seeing
disklabel complain that your `c' partition type isn't "unused"?
> What's the magic incantation to our disklabel to get a reasonably
> complete set of default paritions onto a disk?
I didn't realize there was one. ``disklabel -Brw foo99 auto'' is the
only one I know of.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Disclaimer: Not speaking for FreeBSD, just expressing my own opinion.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010328151503.A88970>