Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:53:17 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Olivier Houchard <mlfbsd@ci0.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARM/SMP, Some patches for review. Message-ID: <D611B1D6-9A3C-457F-A350-5516FFD12DE1@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20121123164805.GA18800@ci0.org> References: <50AA4E87.3000505@semihalf.com> <CACfq093LakTKEf8E3L5S7QnYcgdnBVpnFSRJo%2BMx=mfgbXpg0g@mail.gmail.com> <50ACE2B4.8010904@semihalf.com> <CACfq091X6BK7S5jenr46=iwpsyGEz1FdnRLMhXhPdZ4jd06g0w@mail.gmail.com> <50AE3C0F.20809@semihalf.com> <94A3C1F1-0138-4D11-85BC-9E988AEF2E9F@bsdimp.com> <CACfq092M2xP-tVBH9acdb9qg4geZvmHWohm2Me4iFpryhqixKw@mail.gmail.com> <B76BA216-DDA4-47B8-B85E-7C2DA8952777@bsdimp.com> <20121123164805.GA18800@ci0.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 23, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Olivier Houchard wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:40:42AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >> Furthermore these items are used exclusively to change the compiler args only (except the weird DDB_ENABLED for clean files in the arm makefile that I see absolutely no reason to be there). There should be a better way of doing things, and I'll investigate it. However, I sometimes think we need to revamp all the building substantially, and not just add hacks to config. >> >> There have often been times that I wanted to disable building these for my own reasons not related to what CPU I'm on. >> > > Maybe it's time to make it a separate target again ? > I guess now that we have proper bootloaders it will get less and less useful. I think that you may be right. I'll work up a couple of patches and post them here for review. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D611B1D6-9A3C-457F-A350-5516FFD12DE1>