Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 17:08:19 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> Cc: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/sed main.c sed.1 Message-ID: <p0511174fb8ff434ebd81@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20020508130458.B72921@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200205080304.g4834BL42647@green.bikeshed.org> <p0511174bb8ff15c41118@[128.113.24.47]> <20020508130458.B72921@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 1:04 PM -0700 5/8/02, David O'Brien wrote: >[Bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect >Reply-To:] > >On Wed, May 08, 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > This then suggests we need two command-flags, one which > > always takes an argument and one which never takes one. > >Why do we need to waste two flags on this functionality? >IF we are not going to accurately follow perl, then require >"-i" to have an argument. Oh. Yes, that would be fine with me too. I thought someone had argued that '-i' must not have an argument. That was OK with me, but I'm equally happy to have just the one flag instead of two. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0511174fb8ff434ebd81>