Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 17:10:14 -0700 From: Arun Sharma <adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: libgcc vs libgcc_pic.a (Was Re: ports/18838: kdelibs2 - konqeror crushes with html file) Message-ID: <20000526171014.A28567@sharmas.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: <392F03CD.964EF27C@windriver.com>; from Tadayuki Okada on Fri, May 26, 2000 at 07:07:57PM -0400 References: <392EE977.B3D051C3@windriver.com> <20000526142011.A28240@sharmas.dhs.org> <392EEF3F.7389FFAA@windriver.com> <20000526150848.A28293@sharmas.dhs.org> <392F03CD.964EF27C@windriver.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Moved from ports ] On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 07:07:57PM -0400, Tadayuki Okada wrote: > > 4. Linking libkhtml.so with libgcc.a doesn't fix the problem. I get core > > dumps in __eh_rtime_match. > It should be libgcc_pic.a. > #anyway ld should handle this. Can anyone explain to me the difference between libgcc.a and libgcc_pic.a ? Isn't the code generated by gcc PIC by default ? Also, why is libgcc_r.a necessary ? I don't see such a beast on my linux box. The only difference in build I see is -D_PTHREADS and searching in the sources indicates that nothing is using _PTHREADS. -Arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000526171014.A28567>