Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 May 2000 17:10:14 -0700
From:      Arun Sharma <adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org>
To:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   libgcc vs libgcc_pic.a (Was Re: ports/18838: kdelibs2 - konqeror crushes with html file)
Message-ID:  <20000526171014.A28567@sharmas.dhs.org>
In-Reply-To: <392F03CD.964EF27C@windriver.com>; from Tadayuki Okada on Fri, May 26, 2000 at 07:07:57PM -0400
References:  <392EE977.B3D051C3@windriver.com> <20000526142011.A28240@sharmas.dhs.org> <392EEF3F.7389FFAA@windriver.com> <20000526150848.A28293@sharmas.dhs.org> <392F03CD.964EF27C@windriver.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Moved from ports ]

On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 07:07:57PM -0400, Tadayuki Okada wrote:
> > 4. Linking libkhtml.so with libgcc.a doesn't fix the problem. I get core
> >    dumps in __eh_rtime_match.
> It should be libgcc_pic.a.
> #anyway ld should handle this.

Can anyone explain to me the difference between libgcc.a and libgcc_pic.a ?
Isn't the code generated by gcc PIC by default ?

Also, why is libgcc_r.a necessary ? I don't see such a beast on my linux
box. The only difference in build I see is -D_PTHREADS and searching in
the sources indicates that nothing is using _PTHREADS.

	-Arun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000526171014.A28567>