Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:50:42 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenSSL ASM patch Message-ID: <20010211125042.B79375@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <20010211124707.S3274@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:47:07PM -0800 References: <20010211094946.A51308@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010211122802.A78975@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010211124707.S3274@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Looks awesome, someone complained that Linux was able to maintain > an order of magnitude more SSL connections than FreeBSD, since you > say this gives us a 3-5x speed up, I'd really like to see it committed > and ported to -stable ASAP. Yep! Just want to give a few days for people to comment on the MACHINE_CPU thing. > Is it possible to have multiple ASM cores and use the appropriate > routines? Or must it all be choosen at compile time? It's done at compile-time. Kris --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6hvshWry0BWjoQKURAppKAKDB/UKkN5lU2VVJZ1CV1tQK6zGw9gCgoieS ZOxfgbHVsb+UCPQjTHJLVs0= =0G0H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010211125042.B79375>