Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 21:51:11 +0600 From: Max Khon <fjoe@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228196 - in head: share/mk tools/build/options Message-ID: <CADe0-4=qzSkNyukubFfWe27d-P__9xdTH4NMUhqw70GiOiF7jw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20111203012843.S2543@besplex.bde.org> References: <201112020909.pB299sFk084589@svn.freebsd.org> <20111203012843.S2543@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> wrote: >> Log: >> =C2=A0Revert to conservative defaults. WITH_PROFILE is a default now. >> >> =C2=A0NO_PROFILE overrides in Makefile.inc1 and bsd.own.m are left intac= t >> =C2=A0so that the reversal to the WITHOUT_PROFILE will be easier in futu= re. > > > Thanks. =C2=A0Not building profiled libraries might have been best in 199= 3 > when makeworld took hours (4-10?). =C2=A0When I optimized makeworld in 19= 98, > it still took more than 1 hour but I removing profiling from it was > intentionally left out (except for bootstrapping). =C2=A0It would have sa= ved > only a few minutes. =C2=A0Now, a whole makeworld should take a few minute= s > and the few extra seconds for profiling libraries doesn't matter. The real goal was to have reasonable defaults. The definition of reasonable differs. The definition for some of us is: if I use it it should be the default. My definition is: the system needs minimum tweaks for the majority of users. Max
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADe0-4=qzSkNyukubFfWe27d-P__9xdTH4NMUhqw70GiOiF7jw>