Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:00:48 -0700 From: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org>, FreeBSD Hackers List <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: swap & huge mem systems Message-ID: <20020709050048.GA27599@HAL9000.wox.org> In-Reply-To: <3D2A4DDB.75F8561B@mindspring.com> References: <20020708212522.N945-100000@april.chuckr.org> <20020709015454.GA6323@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <3D2A4DDB.75F8561B@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>: > Erik Trulsson wrote: > > Minimal swap if you want to be able to catch core dumps: Physical RAM > > size + 64K I've caught many core dumps with swap == RAM. Am I just getting lucky, or am I losing 64K of the image? > Crash dumps good. I beg to differ. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020709050048.GA27599>