Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:52:14 -0700 From: Shawn Webb <lattera@gmail.com> To: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS / zpool size Message-ID: <CADt0fhyg8uXQG8SjWPL2DizZRNTdN9poRjo8Y=c62vN4W7iK6w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAMVU60ZtHp%2B_mhuUh-5RuLNW9XFRxBdfQxXu9vPEzw-P%2BrLUUw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAMVU60ZtHp%2B_mhuUh-5RuLNW9XFRxBdfQxXu9vPEzw-P%2BrLUUw@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
The `zpool` command does not show all the overhead from ZFS. The `zfs` command does. That's why the `zfs` command shows less available space than the `zpool` command. Thanks, Shawn On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I have a zpool called data, and I have some inconsistencies with sizes. > > $ zpool iostat > capacity operations bandwidth > pool alloc free read write read write > ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- > data 3.32T 761G 516 50 56.1M 1.13M > > $ zfs list -t all > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > data 2.21T 463G 9.06G /data > > Can anyone throw any light on this? > Is not free the same as AVAIL? > > I do not have any zfs snapshots, but some filesystems are compressed. > > -- > chs, > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADt0fhyg8uXQG8SjWPL2DizZRNTdN9poRjo8Y=c62vN4W7iK6w>