Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:03:33 +0100 From: Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, davidxu@Freebsd.org Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Remko Lodder <remko@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r219003 - head/usr.bin/nice Message-ID: <5965E5EC-A725-423A-9420-B84AD09993DC@elvandar.org> In-Reply-To: <201102241347.39267.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201102241613.p1OGDXpM047076@svn.freebsd.org> <201102241347.39267.jhb@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Feb 24, 2011, at 7:47 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >> > > Are you sure that this statement applies to both ULE and 4BSD? The two > schedulers treat nice values a bit differently. No I am not sure that the statement applies, given your response I understand that both schedulers work differently. Can you or David tell me what the difference is so that I can properly document it? I thought that the tool is doin the same for all schedulers, but that the backend might treat it differently. Thanks Remko > > -- > John Baldwin > -- /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | Quis custodiet ipsos custodes / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and Newshelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5965E5EC-A725-423A-9420-B84AD09993DC>