Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 19:46:21 +0000 From: Mike Baker <mchartrand@janitorialcleaner.com> To: gnome@freebsd.org <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Hi Wisommm Inc, Question re: Your Cleaning Needs Message-ID: <20170316174343.87947.9158.383C8E92@janitorialcleaner.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi=20Wisommm=20Inc, Don=E2=80=99t=20you=20hate=20it=20when=20you=20come=20back=20into=20your=20= office=20in=20the=20morning=20and=20 you=20still=20see=20the=20same=20dust=20on=20your=20counters=20or=20poorly= =20vacuumed=20carpets?=20 And=20then=20when=20you=20bring=20it=20up=20to=20your=20cleaners,=20they=20= fix=20it=20for=20a=20month=20and=20 then=20start=20neglecting=20the=20same=20things? My=20name=20is=20Mike=20Baker,=20Customer=20Relations=20Specialist=20for=20= Janitorial=20 Cleaning=20Solutions.=20For=20over=2010=20years=20we=20have=20been=20provid= ing=20the=20New=20Jersey=20 area=20with=20dependable,=20professional=20and=20quality=20commercial=20cle= aning=20 services.=20We=20proudly=20service=20many=20clients=20such=20as=20Pepsi=20C= o.,=20Bank=20of=20 America,=20and=20GEICO.=20We=20hold=20ourselves=20to=20the=20highest=20stan= dard.=20Our=20 every-time=20promises=20include: =20=20=20=20*=20Tightly=20monitoring=20our=20crews=20to=20ensure=20the=20be= st,=20most=20thorough=20clean =20=20=20=20=20=20on=20every=20visit =20=20=20=20*=20Keeping=20it=20green=20to=20protect=20the=20environment =20=20=20=20*=20Open,=20easy=20communication;=20we=20want=20to=20know=20wha= t=20you=20need =E2=80=9CThank=20you=20for=20the=20outstanding=20service!=20I=20haven=E2=80= =99t=20seen=20a=20single=20dust=20bunny=20 or=20cobweb=20in=20months!=E2=80=9D=20=C2=AD=C2=AD=20John,=20New=20Jersey,= =20NJ. We=20are=20offering=20a=20complimentary=20assessment=20of=20your=20space=20= to=20customize=20your=20 cleaning=20needs=20and=20fit=20your=20budget.=20Would=20you=20like=20more= =20information? =20 With=20best, Mike=20Baker Janitorial=20Cleaning=20Solutions 813-563-8616(Mobile) .=20opt=20out =20 =20 =20 100=20Horizon=20Center=20Blvd., 1st=20and=202nd=20Floors, Hamilton, New=20Jersey <img=20src=3D'http://info.skylinebuildingcare.com/ef1/emopen.php?emo=3D1a5d= d2396a6e035e2aaffb09ccced271'=20width=3D'1'=20height=3D'1'=20/> From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Fri Mar 17 04:15:09 2017 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E3BD0E8E7 for <freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:15:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AA21713 for <freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E21CBD0E8E6; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00EBD0E8E5 for <gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB4E41711 for <gnome@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2H4F8Tq074760 for <gnome@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:15:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217844] devel/gvfs Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:15:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rkoberman@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: <bug-217844-6497-zhvBx8B1gy@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-217844-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-217844-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining <freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-gnome>, <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>, <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:15:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217844 rkoberman@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rkoberman@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from rkoberman@gmail.com --- Because hald is mostly abandoned by Gnome and the FreeBSD code is really, really kludged to try to imitate the Linux code when our kernel does not ha= ve the APIs that the linux code wants. even on the Linux side, it is widely=20 considered a really ugly, hackish thing and that is why the Linux devs have mostly moved on to udev and some other tools (devkit?). FreeBSD seems to fa= vor the use of devd for "easy" instances and modifying codes to work with it or using a FreeBSD udev that is more or less a wrapper on devd, that implements the udev API and not requiring changes to the calling code. I see that the latest X11 test code implements both and allows you choose which to try. Porting hald to FreeBSD was an almost heroic effort, but it is still a klud= ge and getting rid of it is a very good idea, IMHO. I really can't see anything but trivial fixes to hald as being worth the effort, but YMMV and patches a= re always welcome. Just be ready for some nausea when you look at the hald cod= e. At least that was my reaction when I first looked at it. Not really awful c= ode (well, some is) but just a broken first attempt to solve a problem. I'd also mention that the FreeBSD hald is heavily modified and it is quite possible that this 0-day is not even relevant to FreeBSD. (No, I am not volunteering to try to find out.) I am not sure what features will be lost = if hald is removed from gvfs, but I suspect that it will impact me. I'm buildi= ng without HAL now to find out. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170316174343.87947.9158.383C8E92>