Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 8 Oct 2006 23:29:28 -0700
From:      Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Patch available for shared em interrupts (Re: em, bge, network problems survey.)
Message-ID:  <882618BE-88B8-4771-B7A4-2B87282407FD@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061006023424.GA86250@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <45244053.6030706@samsco.org> <20061005200552.GA80162@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061006023424.GA86250@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Oct 5, 2006, at 19:34 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Based on successful testing on a machine with shared em interrupt, the
> following patch should work around the problem *in that case*.

This solves the em(4) issue for me on a shared interrupt.  Prior to  
this, the network hang (no watchdog timeouts) was trivially  
reproducible with an NFS-mounted FreeBSD repository to two builder  
boxes, and running cvs -q upd on the ports tree at the same time.  
(the builder boxes also have em(4) interfaces, which I haven't  
patched, but they're running 7.0-CURRENT).  Everything is i386.

[root@foo:/dtbox] 739# vmstat -i
...
irq21: em0 acpi0                  965426        857
...

- -aDe

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFKexJpXS8U0IvffwRArroAKCR69boUDor2t+L9rXsYXpoYsQkEQCeIcYg
pSAbtbu28DAUE+EbOJUmIk8=
=NbgC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?882618BE-88B8-4771-B7A4-2B87282407FD>