Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 21:59:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: "Daniel C. Fifield" <danf@JadeTech.com> Cc: spork <spork@super-g.com>, "Gary D. Margiotta" <gary@tbe.net>, Jacob Suter <jsuter@linus.intrastar.net>, Ulf Zimmermann <ulf@Alameda.net>, Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk>, shovey@buffnet.net, isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970710215715.21813F-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970710221419.16009A-100000@server1.bisnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 10 Jul 1997, Daniel C. Fifield wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is the guy that put out the original question. I think we got a > little side tracked with price. I am looking for the best solution. > > The way I look at is: I am and ISP and want to provide the most reliable > low maintenance solution to my clients. I also want to have experience > with the solutions I provide. I do not feel comfortable recommending a > FreeBSD box to my clients which have little or no experience > administering a UNIX system. The ideal system would allow us to do > remote monitoring and administration. So with that said what do you think? If you like freeBSD and all, then I suggets you look at our web page www.whistle.com for a FreeBSD based turn-key box that does all you want plus more.. (but then I'm biased) julian (julian@freebsd.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970710215715.21813F-100000>