Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:58:55 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include stdio.h src/lib/libc/sys lseek.2 pathconf.2 src/sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c src/sys/sys filio.h unistd.h Message-ID: <20070406115326.A43678@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200704052110.l35LAsXH013966@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200704052110.l35LAsXH013966@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > pjd 2007-04-05 21:10:54 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > include stdio.h > lib/libc/sys lseek.2 pathconf.2 > sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c > sys/sys filio.h unistd.h > Log: > Implement SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE extensions to lseek(2) as found in > OpenSolaris. For more information please refer to: > > http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/seek_hole_and_seek_data These are just namespace pollution in stdio.h. stdio (fseek()) doesn't support them, and the hack of declaring lseek() in stdio.h should not be extended to new interfaces. If stdio ever supports them, then they would need to be declared under a visibility ifdef (not #ifdef self). Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070406115326.A43678>