Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 23:32:12 +1000 From: Q <q_dolan@yahoo.com.au> To: Eitarou Kamo <e-kamo@trio.plala.or.jp> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD and MacOS Message-ID: <0F3D7DA8-CB63-11D8-9145-000D9335C6A0@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <40E4076E.60201@trio.plala.or.jp> References: <40E1CAAD.3000303@minimum.se> <40E1CF00.2090601@netli.com> <1088557263.3528.102.camel@host-83-146-2-180.bulldogdsl.com> <72A1AE29-CA60-11D8-988E-000A95C969C6@zumbrunn.com> <9B616D82-CB28-11D8-9145-000D9335C6A0@yahoo.com.au> <B435F941-CB2D-11D8-988E-000A95C969C6@zumbrunn.com> <40E4076E.60201@trio.plala.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/07/2004, at 10:45 PM, Eitarou Kamo wrote:
>>> Some of the things that have been adopted from FreeBSD/NetBSD in the
>>> Darwin kernel include:
>>>
>>> Crypto support
>>> Filesystem support for CD9660, DEVFS, NFS, VFS, MEMDEV (Curiously
>>> this doesn't include UFS/FFS support)
>>> IP & IPV6 TCP stack support including BPF & IPFW
>>> Most of the BSD/Posix/SYSV system calls (sysctl, fork, exec, ktrace,
>>> mmap, etc) and corresponding MAN pages.
>
> My curiosity is that the FreeBSD and NetBSD license are left.
> And should those licenses are kept after porting?
Yes the original license and copyright notices are all kept intact,
it's one of the requirements of virtually every opensource license. To
remove them would be a violation of the original copyright holders
requirements.
--
Seeya...Q
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_____ / Quinton Dolan - q_dolan@yahoo.com.au
__ __/ / / __/ / /
/ __ / _/ / / Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
__/ __/ __/ ____/ / - / Ph: +61 419 729 806
_______ /
_\
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0F3D7DA8-CB63-11D8-9145-000D9335C6A0>