Date: 04 Oct 2002 21:23:30 +0200 From: Alex Kiesel <alex.kiesel@document-root.de> To: Fernan Aguero <fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: linux_base vs linux_base-6? Message-ID: <1033759410.235.3.camel@detention.home.ahk> In-Reply-To: <20021004162004.GD65344@iib.unsam.edu.ar> References: <20021004162004.GD65344@iib.unsam.edu.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 18:20, Fernan Aguero wrote: > Now many ports have their dependencies listed as > linux_base-7.1 or something similar. This means that my > linux-compatibility tree got updated when I installed some > of this ports? or should I do this > manually by going to /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base and > doing a 'make install'? Most ports can run with linux-base-6. Personally I have made better experience with linux-base-6. AFAIK linux-base-6 represents a RedHat 6.2 system, while linux-base-7 is RedHat 7.x. > Now, what are the pros and cons of -7.1 and -6? I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7. With version 6 I've had no problems. > Suggestions? I'd continue to run linux-base-6. Greets, Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1033759410.235.3.camel>