Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:37:48 -0500 From: Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com> To: Grant Peel <gpeel@thenetnow.com>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Anti Spam Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.2.20070420163700.025578a8@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT> References: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:43 AM 4/20/2007, Grant Peel wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I am posting this question here because I know there are alot of ISPs
>using FreeBSD (including me) and am hoping to get feedback, either
>directly to me or to the list.
>
>We are wrestling (as I am sure many are), with spam. Up until now we have
>been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam
>servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by.
>
>We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda.
>Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is Easyantispam.
>Does anyone out there have thought on either or both of these? Usability?
>Reliability? Total Cost of ownership? Integration issues?
>
>Any thoughts will be appreciated,
If your volume of mail is >50000 per day don't use the baracuda. It won't
keep up.
-Derek
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.0.22.2.20070420163700.025578a8>