Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 Mar 2010 15:41:14 -0500
From:      dacoder <dc@dcoder.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Thousands of ssh probes
Message-ID:  <20100307204114.GK16274@mail2.dcoder.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B91B36D.1020507@locolomo.org>
References:  <20100305125446.GA14774@elwood.starfire.mn.org> <4B91B36D.1020507@locolomo.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+++ Erik Norgaard [06/03/10 02:44 +0100]:
>On 05/03/10 13:54, John wrote:
>>My nightly security logs have thousands upon thousands of ssh probes
>>in them.  One day, over 6500.  This is enough that I can actually
>>"feel" it in my network performance.  Other than changing ssh to
>>a non-standard port - is there a way to deal with these?  Every
>>day, they originate from several different IP addresses, so I can't
>>just put in a static firewall rule.  Is there a way to get ssh
>>to quit responding to a port or a way to generate a dynamic pf
>>rule in cases like this?
>
>This is a frequent question on the list, search the archives. Basically 
>there are few things that you can do:
>
>1. limit the access to a range of IPs, for example, even if you travel a 
>lot you go to al limited number of countries, why permit access from 
>other continents?
>
>2. limit access to certain users, there is no need to allow games or 
>root user to authenticate via ssh. Use AllowUsers or AllowGroups to 
>restrict access to real users.
>
>3. limit the amount of concurrent non-authenticated connections, number 
>of failed attempts and similar.
>
>4. prohibit password authentication.
>
>If the problem is that these attacks consume significant bandwidth then 
>moving your service to a different port may be a good solution, but if 
>your concern is security, then the above is more effective.
>
>BR, Erik
>
>-- 
>Erik Nørgaard
>Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157                  http://www.locolomo.org
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

-- 
has anybody suggested having sshd listen on a high port?

regards,

david coder
network engineer emeritus, verio/ntt
telluride, co & washington, dc



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100307204114.GK16274>