Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:39:20 -0300 From: Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org> To: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/lua Makefile Message-ID: <20100920133918.GH68468@bluepex.com> In-Reply-To: <864odkh7vz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <201009201201.o8KC1r9H076269@repoman.freebsd.org> <86sk14ipcr.fsf@gmail.com> <20100920122320.GE68468@bluepex.com> <86tylkh9vt.fsf@gmail.com> <20100920124925.GG68468@bluepex.com> <864odkh7vz.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:17:04PM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:33:58PM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> >> Using CFLAGS= in make.conf is broken. This port is not the only thing
> >> that may break. And it builds fine with CFLAGS+=.
> >
> > I didn't know about it, is it broken or deprecated? i'll try to find
> > more information.
>
> No, I was mostly thinking about misuse. But whether resetting *default*
> CFLAGS to empty string works or not I'm not sure without seeing results
> from an exp-run.
Removing USE_GMAKE the problem when you have CFLAGS= on /etc/make.conf
happens again, gmake seems to consider the make.conf and add the -fPIC
correctly.
I'll investigate a bit more it.
- --
Renato Botelho <garga @ FreeBSD.org>
<garga @ freebsdbrasil.com.br>
GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc
The advertisement is the most truthful part of a newspaper
-- Thomas Jefferson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkyXZAYACgkQ6CRbiSJE7ansYgCeJ9DRMfNiI2CZ+VXNm/2EuGxA
afgAniXRgXxVr0MMezAh6TCEhsjLOAHb
=tRqn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100920133918.GH68468>