Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:30:17 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <sat@freebsd.org> To: vd@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, osa@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/ftp/gwget Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/ftp/gwget/files patch-src__gwget_data.c patch-src_gwget_data.c patch-src_main.c patch-src_wget-log.c Message-ID: <cb5206420605110230t694a9e0el3ef40fbaa2dc82fc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060511052958.GA69280@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <200605101908.k4AJ89iI073410@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060511052958.GA69280@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 5/11/06, Vasil Dimov <vd@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:08:09PM +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > sat 2006-05-10 19:08:09 UTC > [...] > > 1.1 +10 -0 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src__gwget_data.c (new) > > 1.2 +0 -10 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src_gwget_data.c (dead) > > About the patches filenaming under files/ we are trying to follow some > convention - see ports/Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl, it's best to always > use that for generating the file names for new patches. Thanks, I'll take a good look. > The reason for not renaming all ports/*/*/files/* to conform to a single > convention is that the history would be lost. > > You should avoid renaming files this way (whatever the new and the > old names are) because the history is lost. I understand this very clearly, the file had no history though, it's just one missing header which should probable be pushed upstream. Thanks!home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420605110230t694a9e0el3ef40fbaa2dc82fc>