Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:19:00 +0200 From: "Thomas E. Zander" <riggs@rrr.de> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EHCI considered harmful? Message-ID: <20041029081900.GH701@marvin.riggiland.au> In-Reply-To: <20041029080817.GB728@empiric.icir.org> References: <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au> <20041029080817.GB728@empiric.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MAH+hnPXVZWQ5cD/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, 29. Oct 2004, at 1:08 -0700, Bruce M Simpson wrote according to [Re: EHCI considered harmful?]: > ehci(4) is not stable code and fails reproducibly with my ALi-based > USB2 disk enclosure. Well, okay then. I was just wondering because it doesn't appear on Scott's todo-list for 5.3-R and it seems to accidently work on my box :-) Thanks, Riggs --=20 - "[...] I talked to the computer at great length and -- explained my view of the Universe to it" said Marvin. --- And what happened?" pressed Ford. ---- "It committed suicide." said Marvin. --MAH+hnPXVZWQ5cD/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFBgfz0jdSJKchZls0RAm0dAJ90a51/JZMIi8DSt9ffVrm/PP+XmQCePQni VZgBFxW85+iBJvcg1S9B/oU= =h9cR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MAH+hnPXVZWQ5cD/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041029081900.GH701>