Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:12 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 230140] textproc/py-sphinx: Update to 1.8.1
Message-ID:  <bug-230140-21822-mYJf5PRH3E@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-230140-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-230140-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230140

--- Comment #16 from Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #15)
I'm fine for having the dependency line in the Makefile of individual port
(maybe I'm more prefer to that.)

I want to point out that this ticket gets stuck because of it's not that ea=
sy
to fix all the fallouts of the upgrade, but there are new ports want to be
added because of needing new sphinx (ex: bug233010 ), which is the least th=
ing
I want to see. I suggest:

- Let's get a new exp-run or just do a self poudriere build against the 3.0=
.2
  (IIRC some of the fallouts in comment5 got fixed by newer version (1.8.x =
in
that time), but I forgot to mention in that comment)
- For fallouts, let's check if them needs 1.8.x or other fixes, or even can=
 be
deprecated.

And I suggest we can set a time to revise (and deprecate) 1.8.x along with
python 2 in ports.

Any comments?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230140-21822-mYJf5PRH3E>