Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:40:30 +0300
From:      Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com>
To:        "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: MPLS
Message-ID:  <CAEW%2BogY=u=2t-wwzTHHgJzkzdeXri0UwNmziWkybNqHu6AtOVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEW%2BogaKnyB_nKc3E5ER%2Bu5w5MCgnPmi-gCuL9gjWPv9mxjLcA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAEW%2Bogb_b6fYLvcEJdhzRnoyjr0ORto9iNyJ-iiNfniBRnPxmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogZTE4Uw-0ROEoSex=VtC%2B0tChupE2RAW5RFOn=OQEuLLw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogYbCkCfbFHT0t2v-VmqUkXLGVHgAHPET3X5c2DnsT=Enw@mail.gmail.com> <5146121B.5080608@FreeBSD.org> <CAEW%2BogaKnyB_nKc3E5ER%2Bu5w5MCgnPmi-gCuL9gjWPv9mxjLcA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Alex,
Got any progress? I'm excited to test mpls in fbsd :)

Sami
=D7=91=D7=AA=D7=90=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9A 15 =D7=91=D7=9E=D7=90=D7=99 2013 17:43=
, =D7=9E=D7=90=D7=AA "Sami Halabi" <sodynet1@gmail.com>:

> Hi Alex,
> Any progress on mpls fbsd?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sami
> On Mar 17, 2013 8:57 PM, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
>>
>>> any one? :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sami Halabi<sodynet1@gmail.com>  wrote=
:
>>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>> Are there ongoing job of mpls in freebsd?
>>>> I saw thd site http://freebsd.mpls.in for aboug a year now and I don't
>>>> see much progress.
>>>>
>>> Yep. It was frozen for a while.
>> Currently I'm working on it again.
>>
>> control plane code was heavily redesigned, see
>> http://bird.mpls.in/projects/**mpls-bird/repository/show?rev=3D**bird_mp=
ls<http://bird.mpls.in/projects/mpls-bird/repository/show?rev=3Dbird_mpls>;
>>
>> I have some working MPLS code on 8-S and I hope to create freebsd svn
>> branch with base MPLS support in 2-3 weeks.
>>
>>  ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation of MPLS out of the box, mayb=
e
>>>>
>>> Their control plane code is mostly useless due to design approach
>> (routing daemons talk via kernel).
>> Their data plane code, well.. Yes, we can use some defines from their
>> headers, but that's all :)
>>
>>> porting it would be short and more straight forward than porting linux
>>>> LDP
>>>> implementation of BIRD.
>>>>
>>> It is not 'linux' implementation. LDP itself is cross-platform.
>> The most tricky place here is control plane.
>> However, making _fast_ MPLS switching is tricky too, since it requires
>> chages in our netisr/ethernet handling code.
>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>> Sami
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEW%2BogY=u=2t-wwzTHHgJzkzdeXri0UwNmziWkybNqHu6AtOVA>