Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:57:52 -0400
From:      Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@chrononomicon.com>
To:        Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
Cc:        Eric Crist <mnslinky@gmail.com>, Grant Peel <gpeel@thenetnow.com>, Christopher Hilton <chris@vindaloo.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
Message-ID:  <FF457225-AFD3-4868-99C6-6A84408E2487@chrononomicon.com>
In-Reply-To: <BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCEEADCAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
References:  <BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCEEADCAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

> There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their  
> mail
> to not be greylisted.  For example, my cell phone's e-mail address is
> in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server failure.
> I would be pretty pissed off if Sprint suddenly started  
> greylisting.  It
> isn't just dumb-ass users making stupid political decisions to reject
> it, although in your case it probably was.

If it is a legitimate mail server, it would be promoted to the auto- 
whitelist.  Not all mail is constantly greylisted by most intelligent  
greylist systems.  Only the first few messages would be delayed,  
until it is established as legitimate.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FF457225-AFD3-4868-99C6-6A84408E2487>