Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:23:10 -0600 From: Blaine Kahle <blaine@binary.net> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: "Gogh, Ruben van" <R.v.Gogh@kappe-int.com> Subject: Re: IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT becomes default to deny Message-ID: <20040206212310.GJ94075@binary.net> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20040206132723.058bf848@localhost> References: <0FDD52D38220D611B7CC0004763B3744F80821@HNTS-04> <4023AD12.6070106@sitetronics.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20040206104336.0587c5a0@localhost> <20040206151109.S921@cithaeron.argolis.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20040206132723.058bf848@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:28:03PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > At 01:16 PM 2/6/2004, Matt Piechota wrote: > > >Aren't supposed to run 'config' on your kernel conf when you modify it? > > Of course. After which you change directories and actually do the > build. (Why this isn't automatic, I don't know.) Because that's the "old" way of doing it. The "new" way (buildkernel, installkernel) has been around for some time (4.2 at the least). http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html -- Blaine Kahle blaine@binary.net 0x178AA0E0
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040206212310.GJ94075>