Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Jan 2011 01:30:40 +0000
From:      Jamie Paul Griffin <jamie@gnix.co.uk>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Portupgrade status
Message-ID:  <20110104013040.GA39411@daemon.gnix.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimBnm9BKCc3LmgL0WCXWRrNMgvx%2BkwwrfQ%2BUGgO@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <14212432ba707fc5f9fbc75b56e8e783@flabnapple.net> <20101226214221.GB68570@stainmore> <AANLkTi=bD60UiybsaioHwEDgsXAQpAeJ6VuPiDvSZ%2B0P@mail.gmail.com> <86pqsogfvu.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4D186D11.1030708@infracaninophile.co.uk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1012271354470.35608@fledge.watson.org> <20110103225455.GA37597@daemon.gnix.co.uk> <AANLkTimngzkkfbFnego5MP50xHLS0NHvnL9to0V3pQTT@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikTi2J-cCzryFEG4cZvDCQxn83ycJ_1AnzO-QJi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimBnm9BKCc3LmgL0WCXWRrNMgvx%2BkwwrfQ%2BUGgO@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:51:48PM -0500, illoai@gmail.com wrote:

> No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
> ports taht have already been built on this run (I
> believe from reading man portmaster).  The -R
> flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which
> the named port depends

Indeed, this -R option is useful. Up-to-now i've not used anything else other than portupgrade but i'll have a look over the man pages of portmaster, etc.; i'll probably continue to use portupgrade for a while though.

	jamie



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110104013040.GA39411>