Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 01:19:33 +0200 From: Dean Strik <dean@stack.nl> To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance improvement for NAT in IPFIREWALL Message-ID: <20030702231933.GD17796@dragon.stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <3F0350C7.7010009@tenebras.com> References: <3F0316DE.3040301@tenebras.com> <20030702183838.GB4179@pit.databus.com> <3F0327FE.3030609@tenebras.com> <3F0331EE.6020707@mac.com> <3F0350C7.7010009@tenebras.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Sierchio wrote: > Chuck Swiger wrote: > > >Many people are wrong, then. NAT is not a security feature. > > We simply disagree. Puh-leaze. Not this discussion again. Can we stay on topic please? -- Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology dean@stack.nl | dean@ipnet6.org | http://www.ipnet6.org/ "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030702231933.GD17796>