Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:13:34 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html Message-ID: <4E5CA9BE.2020005@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <201108300929.51810.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> <201108300929.51810.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/30/11 09:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >> 27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>> This website should be brushed up or taken offline! >>> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days. >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html >> I think this one would better look like list of major features with os >> comparison, like: >> >> = Networking = >> * IPv6: major support, best stack around. >> * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e. >> ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet). >> >> = Data storage = >> * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Linux >> has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has >> dynamic disks since XP (?features). >> >> = SMP = >> * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some >> rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like >> DragonflyBSD and QNX). >> > And USB. I believe there are significant changes in the USB subsystems which > those who are making performance benchmarks completely fail to mention. > > --HPS > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" What's about DTrace? = Development/System Profiling = * DTrace: Some notes of the Kernel Gurus what this could mean for performance profiling and development = Licensing Model = * Some striking comments on the advantage for companies or interested people of the BSD-like licensing model over the GPLv3 on which Linux is based now and which has serious implications for those who wants to develop and sell software developed on/with GNU stuff. it would be very honest, if we do not only emphasize only the pros. BSD came from the academic environment, that was where I met it the first time and I appreciated the way things were developed and 'sloppyness' was a nogo. So we should keep it up and a serious and honest set of contraru points for all compared OS should be appreciable. Does the VM of FreeBSD still have advantges (measurable) over Linux?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5CA9BE.2020005>