Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:01:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> To: "Gary D. Margiotta" <gary@tbe.net> Cc: spork <spork@super-g.com>, FreeBSD-ISP <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd hosting. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005051058240.2471-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005051023420.63612-100000@thud.tbe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 5 May 2000, Gary D. Margiotta wrote: [...] : In correlation, I believe T1's are horridly expensive out West also, so : DSL, even if there is a slight downtime, is much more cost-effective than : a PTP or Frame circuit (this is my own guess, not based on any hard : evidence). [...] Depends on that business really. If you're in a line of work where any downtime upsets a large group of customers, downs their web pages, and so forth, it's far better to take the extra cost involved. I agree that if you want to provide an office with a high bandwidth solution, DSL is the way to go. I however do not trust it for production hosting on any application that requires 24/7 uptime. Matt Heckaman matt@arpa.mail.net http://www.lucida.qc.ca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE5EuJQdMMtMcA1U5ARAuCsAJ48ucgMUtUxN5fKrtV30Atuz3+VRwCgkr7O dPfJI7rV4i3bMUF+Njmw0SQ= =EmYr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005051058240.2471-100000>