Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:11:08 -0500 From: David Schultz <das@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r230363 - in head/lib/libc/softfloat: . bits32 bits64 Message-ID: <20120120181108.GA39735@zim.MIT.EDU> In-Reply-To: <201201200753.13232.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201201200616.q0K6GEwT026852@svn.freebsd.org> <20120120065006.GA80490@zim.MIT.EDU> <201201200753.13232.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, January 20, 2012 1:50:06 am David Schultz wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012, David Schultz wrote: > > > Merge in the latest SoftFloat changes from NetBSD. (NetBSD isn't the > > > original vendor, but we're using their heavily modified version.) > > > This brings in functions for long double emulation (both extended and > > > quad formats), which may be useful for testing, and also for replacing > > > libc/sparc64/fpu/. > > > > I'd appreciate it if an svn guru could let me know if anything > > needs to be done to record the fact that this is a merged copy of > > /vendor/NetBSD/softfloat/dist@230364. `svn merge --record-only $url' > > didn't do anything, I'm guessing because there's no history yet. > > The previous libc/softfloat sources were a mishmash, so I didn't try > > to recreate any merge history for those. > > Did you use 'svn cp' to add the bits in from the vendor tree? If so, there's > no need to do an record-only merge. In general we only need to do record-only > merge to bootstrap mergeinfo when doing the first merge for a vendor tree > after the CVS -> SVN conversion. For new vendor sources that are 'svn cp'd > from the vendor area, SVN will just DTRT from the start. Unfortunately, no. The prior contents of the directory were taken from NetBSD at different points in time as early as 2002 and then modified. I updated them to a consistent snapshot outside of svn, and then decided only in retrospect that it would be nice to be able to track the vendor sources in the tree directly.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120120181108.GA39735>