Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 09:18:13 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> Cc: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>, Forrest Aldrich <forrie@navipath.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Message-ID: <390EFFC5.52BFA1D7@elischer.org> References: <v0422080ab53464df3042@[195.238.1.121]> <10849.957266163@critter.freebsd.dk> <200005021424.KAA73367@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20000502104034.G3818@drama.navipath.com> <20000502100020.B29588@dan.emsphone.com> <v04220803b534a302a835@[195.238.1.121]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brad Knowles wrote:
>
> At 10:00 AM -0500 2000/5/2, Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> > .. means that a user that wanted to use FreeBSD in a commercial
> > application would not be able to simply sell his product; he would have
> > to get a license from Sleepycat.
>
I asked the Keith about this and he said it was wrong..
(to my memory).
I recall he said that as it would be grandfathered into freeBSD,
(because we had 1.x already) and
that anyone running their software under freeBSD could do so
without added licencing, because it was already present on the
platform.
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
/ \ julian@elischer.org
( OZ ) World tour 2000
---> X_.---._/ presently in: Perth
v
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?390EFFC5.52BFA1D7>