Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:17:27 -0800 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: rgrimes@freebsd.org, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r344567 - in head: etc/mtree include sbin sbin/veriexec Message-ID: <b6a461b9-79dd-cd7e-bc7f-ab4d3d3c9652@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <f917e2f2-67f5-e3f7-cb53-0768626b31c2@FreeBSD.org> References: <201902260617.x1Q6HOra098699@repo.freebsd.org> <201902260619.x1Q6Jjn2043418@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <20190226134953.GB39566@FreeBSD.org> <34ecb52f-c89e-0d5e-594e-25b0d045d171@FreeBSD.org> <20190226172358.GA67992@FreeBSD.org> <f917e2f2-67f5-e3f7-cb53-0768626b31c2@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/26/19 10:06 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On 2/26/19 9:23 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:12:11AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: >>> On 2/26/19 5:49 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:19:45PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>> Just a small nit, for future reference, from the template: >>>>>> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D### >>>>> (*full* phabric URL needed). >>>> >>>> IMHO we should just fix the scripts to accept D#### alone, without >>>> the URL. We don't do that for PR (bugzilla) references, and the fact >>>> that we do for the phab is both needless and confusing. Also, that >>>> URL might change one day while we could probably keep the old numbers >>>> if we move. >>> >>> It makes the review clickable in many mail clients which is very handy. >> >> I understand that, but then again, we don't do that for PRs and people >> don't seem to complain. Accepting D#### would make this all consistent >> and commit messages cleaner. Arguably, if one likes to click the URLs >> in their mail client, why not configure the client to expand the URL in >> place? >> >>> -- >>> John Baldwin >>> >>> \x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a >> >> Can you do something about this horde of \x9a's appended to your every >> email John? > > Bizarre, that's the first time someone has mentioned that. It appears to > be a misfeature of Thunderbird which I switched to last year after kmail > in kde5 officially moved to "unusable trash fire" status. It doesn't show > up locally, and the signature file I'm using doesn't contain them: > > % hexdump .signature > 0000000 2d 2d 20 0a 4a 6f 68 6e 20 42 61 6c 64 77 69 6e > 0000010 0a > 0000011 > > Switching to using an inline signature instead of a signature file didn't > fix it either. :( I haven't found an existing bug report for this yet. With a tip from cem@ I narrowed the cause of this down to a "Wrap Text" plugin I had been using to annotate where to wrap text in the compose window. I've disabled it, so the spam should be gone. My mails might not wrap sanely though. :-/ -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b6a461b9-79dd-cd7e-bc7f-ab4d3d3c9652>