Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:24:58 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> To: MET <met@uberstats.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PHP and Apache Message-ID: <20020724152458.GF4999@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> In-Reply-To: <000601c23326$11a49dd0$6801a8c0@SURVIVAL> References: <000601c23326$11a49dd0$6801a8c0@SURVIVAL>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> From: "MET" <met@uberstats.com>
> To: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
> Subject: PHP and Apache
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:23:22 -0400
>
> First off thanks to all those who helped me out, I've finally gotten
> everything up and running. In doing so however I've come across 3
> different options for making PHP work w/ apache.
>
> 1) PHP as a CGI through Apache
>
> 2) PHP as a shared Apache Module ( --with-apxs=[FILE] )
>
> 3) PHP as an Apache Module ( --with-apache=[FILE] )
>
> Basically, I'm wondering what's the big difference between the second
> two, and which is better.
depends on your needs. --with-apxs creates a dynamic module, while
--with-apache compiles php into apache. the first is easier to
upgrade (you only need to compile new version of php [as opposed to
php *and* apache]), the second is a bit faster.
--
FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE
5:22PM up 8 days, 3:41, 9 users, load averages: 0.05, 0.05, 0.00
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020724152458.GF4999>