Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 11:36:32 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Subject: Re: latest -current doesn't execute BSDI-binary bladeenc Message-ID: <XFMail.990317113632.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <xzpbthtkk8o.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17-Mar-99 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > that bladeenc does not run, the problem is that a BSDI executable > > does not run. Which breaks a promise from > The bug is on the web site, not in the kernel. David Greenman > committed a patch to better support large memory configurations. > Unfortunately, it seems this was not possible to achieve without > breaking BSDI compatibility. Would it be feasable to have an option to switch between the two? I can see people wanting BSDI compatibility and not having large quantities of RAM being fairly common. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990317113632.doconnor>