Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:00:20 -0800 From: John Hixson <jhixson@freebsd.org> To: Michael Osipov <michaelo@freebsd.org> Cc: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: git: ece1cb52e7ff - main - security/sssd: mark port deprecated Message-ID: <cy3g5xomwle67x3h2spzd67hzjweojiubw5op3ka2h5szwoz5c@t4sbqefurn6c> In-Reply-To: <a7ee24f4-2ba3-4bb4-a306-0ed89728ab8a@FreeBSD.org> References: <202402030553.4135rFLH050086@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <CALH631kLSy5rBFtXsUbDeXUQ-8P3oWZ6pkN6Tz%2BTwinnifNd6w@mail.gmail.com> <a7ee24f4-2ba3-4bb4-a306-0ed89728ab8a@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pllxqk7473fvjtux Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Michael Osipov wrote: > On 2024-02-03 07:25, Gleb Popov wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 8:53=E2=80=AFAM John Hixson <jhixson@freebsd.org= > wrote: > > >=20 > > > The branch main has been updated by jhixson: > > >=20 > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=3Dece1cb52e7ffa225bc1c= 8ed659c5974ef1c0088d > > >=20 > > > commit ece1cb52e7ffa225bc1c8ed659c5974ef1c0088d > > > Author: John Hixson <jhixson@FreeBSD.org> > > > AuthorDate: 2024-02-03 05:51:53 +0000 > > > Commit: John Hixson <jhixson@FreeBSD.org> > > > CommitDate: 2024-02-03 05:51:53 +0000 > > >=20 > > > security/sssd: mark port deprecated > > >=20 > > > - Very old version of this port no longer supported > > > - sssd-devel has current versions > >=20 > > Why not just update this port to the devel version? >=20 > I agree with Gleb. This is unnecessarily confusing and many will likely > refuse to use a -devel port in production. Other ports do have regular po= rts > and real -devel ports as well. For me, this violates POLA somewhat. >=20 > M What is the proper route to take here? sssd-devel isn't really a "devel" port. It's just the up to date version of sssd. The current sssd port is very old (like 5 years or more). I would like to just replace it with the new version but don't want to force an update for anyone who may rely on it. Should sssd-devel be renamed sssd2 and sssd be renamed sssd1 or some such? What is this POLA that I am possibly violating by the way? Thanks, - John --pllxqk7473fvjtux Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEJaAswQZQMflCdCA6RqljBb/iPUAFAmXDxTRfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDI1 QTAyQ0MxMDY1MDMxRjk0Mjc0MjAzQTQ2QTk2MzA1QkZFMjNENDAACgkQRqljBb/i PUBonBAAqY6VQq3gT8mASEaZ0jC0vM75dfHFOvgk3dsLdOb161TdO8LzV0YZLkKn s97IK64JqgIJHbXpZMX/fJeeWkPV6WJo28BkGQGTt5mS9ELFVaXQ03mUCQcEI3Ns RKL3YJadkrM9nXes78owaHLxzq5seYeIBjr6FrvwgNsHyzQPGbBGCo9kYWgtMXeW FdGKdX0uTDwm3XMvTajGx/bP1c7L0xHlOZkaTlSiVYKP7rCXYGYyZlxLbd9YsWtd YGGX+Y84QWciuW3D4EX+rc6jV1xgnUIG3F9vqccwE+DTzXcWq/FUKvvm8HtGyTA1 Mw242d6PQq4gT2X+Q2pyZgvSrv+Yllost834/xHWnSnQoh6GHfZFmBjUQF0ZdoOu r3ZCbwqvRRMjC1un0uWMK3CakC9rTunOUhwmCnWytWdUhqvjvXGsJwtfpmV+qUUM 5FmpWbt5vpNw+k+nSoxOgvNuh1ddlLndgOJG9dVrzLjTHjt1oe8+00xdeq603zTu gaJN0HOdd1A3a2RIHeV9RsXTXL2wOUTsRA2Ulz030LUT/GP16JP6nLQMdIGuGfDW d6V/1jw7UlU/LvU2ghUM7aMWVZ6ukYM325xkEWJx0/20845QQWc6gYXtlHdBr1V6 D6Vq+C2P1YOVjddIQUp6lUs1tAWZmhY6H4Zez8Thpo89Kyid5No= =A8PI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pllxqk7473fvjtux--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cy3g5xomwle67x3h2spzd67hzjweojiubw5op3ka2h5szwoz5c>