Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:56:00 -0500 From: Kevin Wilcox <kevin.wilcox@gmail.com> To: Peter McAlpine <peter@aoeu.ca> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routing return NAT traffic based on interface Message-ID: <CAFpgnrN4UWHrkS1sGAqy6jf4vL%2BXi9b%2BoCfbZEF_T=xWt-D6tQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFpgnrO9r_L1syR4STqvNJHTQ2cCFo6U711JNc_Uu-_eEkTQfg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEDV4ypAo21-4KYws0LTxC%2BXSNNtSmWvMpvFGro6BqNH2z==Wg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFpgnrO3o1==XtxDK__KmEhX1C947DHhj5N_NptKomFBba3fzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEDV4ypG9vA4iDVkHD2gSJ3J81DNSMjjoU2_98Jd-2V=nXHz7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFpgnrO9r_L1syR4STqvNJHTQ2cCFo6U711JNc_Uu-_eEkTQfg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Nov 19, 2012 5:54 PM, "Kevin Wilcox" <kevin.wilcox@gmail.com> wrote: > It is. The "pass in" rule I used in my example assumes the inside interface and the other devices it talks to are in the same network. Correction, the "pass in" and "nat" rules, not just the pass. They both have to be modified. kmwhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFpgnrN4UWHrkS1sGAqy6jf4vL%2BXi9b%2BoCfbZEF_T=xWt-D6tQ>