Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:29:08 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> Cc: Ulrich Spoerlein <q@uni.de>, toni@stderror.at, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.0-STABLE ??? Message-ID: <20030122082908.GB3772@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <200301211745.h0LHjUIf002336@intruder.bmah.org> References: <200301192336.h0JNam2r036785@lurza.secnetix.de> <01ad01c2c02c$e84eaf40$0101a8c0@cascade> <20030120032658.GA35779@gforce.johnson.home> <20030120200112.GA98053@devil.stderror.at> <20030121172611.3d2f7082.q@uni.de> <200301211745.h0LHjUIf002336@intruder.bmah.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:45:30AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > On 2003/01/20-21:01:12 Toni Schmidbauer wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 09:26:59PM -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote: > > > > So if one decides to make the jump to 5.0 and wants to track > > > > development, should -CURRENT be tracked or RELENG_5_0? > > > > > > -CURRENT > > > > > > RELENG_5_0 contains only critical bugfixes and security updates, > > > as mentioned above. > >=20 > > To finally clear things: Where will RELENG_5_1 come from? I guess it wi= ll > > be branched from -CURRENT too? >=20 > If we (RE) decide that the 5-STABLE development train should start with > 5.1, I'm guessing we'd branch RELENG_5 and then branch RELENG_5_1 from=20 > that. We haven't really discussed this point. >=20 > If not, we create RELENG_5_1 from HEAD, and revisit the issue when it=20 > comes time to do 5.2. >=20 > In the end, the exact origin of RELENG_5_1 is much less likely to have > any real effect on anybody than the state of the code at the time the > branch is made. So this means that HEAD is still kept in a stable state, or at least stable API-wise, so that 5.1 can be branched from it if needed? What changes are 'planned' for 5.1? Any overview available? Of course it's not going to be comprehensive, but I am just wondering. --Stijn --=20 Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+LlZUY3r/tLQmfWcRAixRAJ4p14sszF6VosIX4wM4v03NCGY+OQCfZyiv /F6Nvvo8+u2UvW2k4eZraQM= =q87t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030122082908.GB3772>