Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 03 Apr 2000 15:20:57 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        hm@hcs.de
Cc:        garyj@muc.de, bright@wintelcom.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: MLEN and crashes 
Message-ID:  <21185.954768057@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 03 Apr 2000 15:17:57 %2B0200." <20000403131757.4F48238FA@hcswork.hcs.de> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000403131757.4F48238FA@hcswork.hcs.de>, Hellmuth Michaelis writes
:
>>From the keyboard of Poul-Henning Kamp:
>
>> We need to be frugal about the kernel stack, for a lot of reasons,
>> that's just the way it is, and as far as I know it is the way
>> it will continue to be.
>
>Good. I'd like to learn something from it: Shall i avoid allocating
>structs on the kernel stack at all or is it just bad to allocate
>big structs ?

My own rule of thumb is "about 60 bytes or so", but it also depends
on the lifetime of the function.  If it is a leaf function which
doesn't call anything else I'll let it use more stack, if it is
a function which is burried at the bottom (top really) of the stack
all the time I'm less tolerant.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21185.954768057>