Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:57:35 +0200
From:      Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 11-CURRENT redports builders miscompiling?
Message-ID:  <543461CF.9040701@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAALwa8nc=wCBKCkcUQu9LOfBqr5NH8XqKxpTXhUDwGZBeQgEUA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201410071915.s97JFrQo061043@svn.freebsd.org> <54343E60.7050208@FreeBSD.org> <CAALwa8k1EejjEk_HFFXVvLGyg4d69UWZoBhHkvydMf5yLe-FCA@mail.gmail.com> <543443CE.6000900@FreeBSD.org> <CAALwa8nc=wCBKCkcUQu9LOfBqr5NH8XqKxpTXhUDwGZBeQgEUA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 07.10.2014 um 22:17 schrieb Antoine Brodin:

> So,  the test fail on head,  but if you look carefully,  1480342*1024
> = 0x5a5a... which looks like malloc junk.

Bingo, thanks for the pointer.

> But when I turn off malloc debugging ( ln -s 'abort:false,junk:false'
> /etc/malloc.conf ) the tests succeed.
> 
> So it looks like a bug in e2fsprogs.

Yup, reproduced with "make post-build MALLOC_OPTIONS=J", and valgrind
also has something to complain about, so I'll forward a report upstream.

I haven't seen something in the "maint" branch since the release that
looks like an obvious fix.

This lets 11-CURRENT and redports off the hook for now.  I wasn't aware
redports-on-11 set MALLOC_OPTIONS=J or equivalent.

Cheers,
Matthias



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?543461CF.9040701>