Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 22:04:46 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Even more interesting NFS problems.. Message-ID: <10965.917762686@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Jan 1999 20:09:58 PST." <19990130200958.B66257@relay.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes, to be consistent with the state of world WRT NFS. Or at least with
> the leader -- Solaris. This has been the default in 3.0-C since the
> am-utils import.
Yeah, well, amd is a whole other ball of wax. That's clearly broken
in both 3.0-stable and 4.0-current and we're going to have to revert
the last set of changes fairly soon, it's on my TODO list of things to
deal with.
> You could easily still be using TCP rather than UDP. Using "proto=X" and
> "vers=Y" you can specify the version and protocol used, independent of
> each other. X={tcp,udp} and Y={2,3}
> "nfsv2" is an synonym for "proto=udp,vers=2".
Yeah, I think that was in fact the problem here.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10965.917762686>