Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 19:09:31 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.MT.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-user@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/compat20 libgcc.so.261.0.uu Message-ID: <199503140209.TAA04352@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> "Re: cvs commit: src/release/compat20 libgcc.so.261.0.uu" (Mar 13, 5:55pm)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > That does not cover all of what section 3 states, he is providing a GPL > > based binary without the sources or any notice of where the sources are > > or without an offer to provide the sources. > > Before we go balistic here, can we just take a DEEP breath ? Actually, I'm not angry and I don't think Rod is either. We are merely pointing out that we need to think of the 'total' solution to this problem since what is in there so far is not enough. > As to how this is to be provided, and what measures we have to take to > comply with the ($#^#&$%@&ing) GPL, is to be determined. I will have no > problems checking out the source code for this, (cvs co -t RELEASE20) during > the "make release" and include it in the "compat20" if that is the solution. Fine by me. Back to ld hacking. :-) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503140209.TAA04352>