Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:47:23 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r206046 - in head/crypto/openssl: . apps crypto crypto/asn1 crypto/bio crypto/bn crypto/bn/asm crypto/engine crypto/evp crypto/ocsp crypto/rand engines fips ssl Message-ID: <4BB5065B.5000702@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100401204324.GB1301@arthur.nitro.dk> References: <201004011519.o31FJpw2068549@svn.freebsd.org> <4BB4E3DF.8030407@FreeBSD.org> <20100401204324.GB1301@arthur.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/01/10 13:43, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > B0;253;0cOn 2010.04.01 11:20:15 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 04/01/10 08:19, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: >>> Author: simon >>> Date: Thu Apr 1 15:19:51 2010 >>> New Revision: 206046 >>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/206046 >>> >>> Log: >>> Merge OpenSSL 0.9.8n into head. >> >> Just curious, why not 1.0.0? > > The main reason is that 0.9.8n is needed for MFC to 7 and 8, so I > prefered to get it tested a bit in -CURRENT first while I have the > chance. I also prefered to get the security fixes for 0.9.8m into > head faster - I don't know how much trouble 1.0.0 will be, but it will > probably take some work. Sounds reasonable, thanks for the explanation. > That said, given how long OpenSSL 1.0 has been under way it would have > been perfect to commit it today of all days :-). Yes. :) -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BB5065B.5000702>