Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:26:46 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com>
Cc:        "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org>,  "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: RSS_UDP_IPV4_EX?
Message-ID:  <CAJ-Vmont9D-B8Cyjho08sV7kTbCYfM8QrzSog1=J7Cfj3suKPw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMOc5cwFuwSc-Oo%2BUR3aY7pKbfef93cahi2ehmJ-F9FVj_7tBw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAMOc5cwL_Z15p3334jJ1SBtC3rP1Vn%2BtP_sFzSBeaMG1AK7sZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmok5JePWFc-y9YhnjKptuw49wy-dw2kj_8Mk1Jnfb=VG7g@mail.gmail.com> <E43C698C-98D8-41DC-A97A-442FE31415E5@FreeBSD.org> <CAMOc5cwFuwSc-Oo%2BUR3aY7pKbfef93cahi2ehmJ-F9FVj_7tBw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Please do!


-a


On 3 September 2017 at 17:48, Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Robert N. M. Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> My recollection here is (quite) hazy, as it's been a while, but it's likely
>> that this was a transcription error. The set of hash types was largely
>> modelled on what Chelsio offered in the T3 (if I recall), and also what was
>> documented in the Microsoft RSS white paper, so it may be worth taking a
>> look at those sources to see if something makes itself obvious.
>>
>> (There do seem to be some odd variations in hashing types supported by
>> various NICs -- e.g., hashing but with different hash algorithms in certain
>> generations of cards, etc, so it also wouldn't surprise me if it did
>> correspond to something real. Clearly the comment is not good enough to
>> explain that, if so!)
>
> I checked latest RSS updates from Microsoft.  There is no such type.
> But they did add UDP_IP4, UDP_IPV6 and UDP_IPV6_EX.  I am going to
> whack UDP_IPV4_EX and update various comment.  I will setup a review
> soon.
>
> Thanks,
> sephe
>
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> On 2 Sep 2017, at 00:43, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I seem to recall it was something some chipsets supported? I forget the
>> details.
>>
>>
>>
>> -adrian
>>
>>
>> On 30 August 2017 at 00:07, Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> IPv4 UDP with extended headers o_O?  Or it was just a mistake.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> sephe
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tomorrow Will Never Die
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tomorrow Will Never Die



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmont9D-B8Cyjho08sV7kTbCYfM8QrzSog1=J7Cfj3suKPw>