Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:15 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253086] New Port: sysutils/nq: create queues of jobs which will run one at at time in the background of the shell Message-ID: <bug-253086-7788-sjd59M0IcX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-253086-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-253086-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253086 Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |In Progress Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |tobik@freebsd.org --- Comment #8 from Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to daniel.engberg.lists from comment #1) > The general solution for the other variables is to use ?=3D instead of =3D The most practical solution for that is to just override them in MAKE_ARGS instead of patching it. Sometimes that is not possible but here it is. The nq port already does this and it is what upstream wants as well as explained in https://github.com/leahneukirchen/nq/pull/20 (In reply to jsmith from comment #7) > The reason I forked upstream is the maintainer doesn't seem to > have done any work on nq in the past four years and has rejected any > porting/documentation pull requests. Ok, look... None of that seems to be true. If we discuss something like this can we try to do it on some kind of material basis. 1. nq is stable and simple. There is no reason why there would have been a lot of work on it. 2. The last release was in March 2018. That was ~3 years ago. 3. Leah is active elsewhere on GitHub. It is not like she disappeared for 3 years. 4. All new pull requests were done in the last 28 days and no reasonable time frame for merging them was given before forking. Actually all PRs have been merged or given good explanations as to why they have been rejected. There is no basis for forking and switching the package over to it. Anyway I'll take nq back now and bring in the kqueue patch which seems to be what this PR boils down to. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-253086-7788-sjd59M0IcX>