Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 01:02:13 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: tput failing on 10 and 12 systems? Message-ID: <e4e36daa-3e11-93a5-a977-2632f2fd01a0@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=sFViKYBWLCPmakq7oRB6jsyMzWVvFjTLTNzrg8gymbQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <834855a9-adcd-71b3-2422-e9eb97258486@freebsd.org> <CAJ-Vmo=sFViKYBWLCPmakq7oRB6jsyMzWVvFjTLTNzrg8gymbQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22/11/2016 12:49 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hiya, > > Just to follow through - part of tput is to decode command args, but > it then just requests it from the ncurses tputs() call. > > So it could be tput, but it could also be the BSD ncurses work. but the ncurses stuff works for things like vim > > > -adrian > > > On 21 November 2016 at 07:54, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: >> example on freefall (FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r306376) >> >> julian@freefall:tput setaf 4|od -c >> 0000000 033 [ m >> 0000003 >> >> so nothing happens, and tput returns 1. >> >> but on a FreeBSD 8 system: >> >> [jelischer@alpha ~]$ tput setaf 4|od -c >> 0000000 033 [ 3 4 m >> 0000005 >> >> which make the text change color. >> >> >> similarly all the related tput color commands I can think of fail on >> 10,11,12 >> >> but programs such as vim can use color just fine. So I suspect tput itself. >> >> >> anyone have experience with this? seems easy to reproduce. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e4e36daa-3e11-93a5-a977-2632f2fd01a0>