Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Apr 1999 15:50:35 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: About that 'new-bus' stuff. 
Message-ID:  <56929.923957435@zippy.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Apr 1999 01:56:41 %2B0800." <19990412175644.7DE5F1F4F@spinner.netplex.com.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you very much for this summary!  Like most people, I don't think
this is a political issue between new-bus and newconfig, it's simply
what we've already got on the Alpha and now need to bring to the x86
 for consistency's sake.

I also suspect that once this code is in -current, and I'd personally
like to see that happen, what eventually evolves from it will probably
represent the best of both newconfig and new-bus, it being the nature
of software to constantly change. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56929.923957435>