Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 00:22:06 +0100 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com Subject: Re: dependencies in portmaster Message-ID: <200803020022.07632.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <47c9e1a1.c98z3hRYgXce6kBO%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <47c9e1a1.c98z3hRYgXce6kBO%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 02 March 2008 00:07:13 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> If I am understanding the portmaster manpage correctly this is close
> to what -n would do, but I don't even want it to do 'make config'
Yes, you do.
Because make config determines the dependencies.
If speed is what you're worried about, then first do:
make config-recursive
in the port you want to investigate, then do portmaster -n - OR,
specify BATCH=yes and PACKAGE_BUILDING=yes to portmaster as make flags. But
note that that will accept a set of default options, as defined by the port
maintainer.
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200803020022.07632.fbsd.questions>
