Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:42:43 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: John Smith <almarrie@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD Message-ID: <20061126194243.GA76643@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0611260832m448702e8yaf660e73c08da0de@mail.gmail.com> References: <499c70c0611260212sa53a2bcq6345f063b7bfdddf@mail.gmail.com> <cb5206420611260418h70415e4buc807f001e9b0c9da@mail.gmail.com> <499c70c0611260832m448702e8yaf660e73c08da0de@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 07:32:13PM +0300, John Smith wrote: > On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@freebsd.org> wrote: > >On 11/26/06, John Smith <almarrie@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? > > > >The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless > >you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and > >maybe take active maintainership of it. > > > >You can try it just for the fun of it, but your problem reports > >will be met by a grinning "we told you so". > > >=20 > Thank you Andrew, >=20 > I'm asking because I downloaded PC-BSD 1.3 Beta which is based on > FreeBSD 6.1 and the default in kernel is ULE, so I wanted to make > sure. That's unfortunate :( Kris --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFae4zWry0BWjoQKURAk5JAJ4rBCvpP/HOlDFTabth+b4e6n+BqQCdF0ha zfRfjJ5cQN9kjGkfmBGm7nY= =v0Q2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061126194243.GA76643>